Home Home CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE GUILTY OF SEDITION?

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE GUILTY OF SEDITION?

438
0
SHARE
SACRAMENTO, CA - MARCH 19: California Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon (C) speaks as Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins (L) and Sen. Bob Huff (R) (R-Diamond Bar) look on during a news conference to announce emergency drought legislation on March 19, 2015 in Sacramento, California. As California enters its fourth year of severe drought, California Gov. Jerry Brown joined Senate President pro Tempore Kevin de Leon, Assembly Speaker Toni Atkins, Republican Leaders Senator Bob Huff and Assemblymember Kristin Olsen to announce emergency legislation that aims to assist local communities that are struggling with devastating drought. The $1 billion package is designed to expedite bond funding to help ensure that all Californians have access to local water supplies. (Photo by Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

{CONSIDER THE WHISKEY REBELLION}

Certain members of the California legislature have unequivocally crossed the line from First Amendment protected free speech (see Bill of Rights, First Amendment) into the criminal conduct of Sedition against the laws and government of the United States. Sedition is defined by the United States Code, 18 U.S. Code § 2384, as follows:

“If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.”
 (18 U.S. Code § 2384)

The operative language, wherein, members of the California legislature are in clear violation of 18 U.S. Code section 2384, among other untoward conduct, is voting for, passing and sustaining a bill advocating the California Republic as a designated, “sanctuary state”.  Such out-of-control conduct by members of the California legislature is beyond the rebellious body designated and specific constitutional authority. Such a declaration of California as a “sanctuary state” is an open and immediate rebellion against the stated constitutional authority and jurisdiction of the United States of America.

Article III of the American Constitution provides the United States Congress with the preeminent Federal jurisdiction over the United States laws respecting immigration policy, rules, regulations, statutes and laws.

Article I, clearly indicates that the California legislature, cannot “enter any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation with a State outside the American Union and “no State shall without the Consent of Congress enter into an Agreement or Compact with a …a foreign power. (see Article I, Section 10 (1)(2), as cited below.

Article I: Section 10

“1: No State shall enter any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

3: No State shall, without the Consent of Congress, lay any Duty of Tonnage, keep Troops, or Ships of War in time of Peace, enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State, or with a foreign Power, or engage in War, unless actually invaded, or in such imminent Danger as will not admit of delay.”

Hence, the American Constitution, Article 1, Section 10 (1) and (3) are quite clear, so clear, that liberal contradictory case law could not even confuse the constitutional pronouncements as intended by the original framers.

That is, no State in this constitutional American Union can enter any foreign treaty, alliance nor confederacy outside of Federal jurisdiction, without Federal approval or instead or replacement of Federal Constitutional jurisdiction and authority. To do so is treason and sedition.

Moreover, the American Constitution further proscribes the member States of the Union by prohibiting each respective member from fully engaging in Article I, Section 8 activity, such as cited as follows:

Article I, Section 8

1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts, and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

4: To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;”

(see Article I, Section 8, {1} and {4}.)

Therefore, Article I, Section 8 elucidates the mandate, in clear and unequivocal terms, that specifically, authority over immigration issues are granted to the United States Congress and absolutely are not vested in the respective State legislatures. This is true under any but the most limited circumstances.

Hence, the inherent language of the United States Constitution is a powerful indictment of the outrageous and rebellious conduct of many members of the California State legislature. The idea that the California legislature can pass a bill or declaration, in regards, to a “sanctuary state” status is utterly preposterous and demonstrates treasonous and seditious conduct. This should be so, without question. State legislatures simply do not have” jurisdictional powers over immigration matters pursuant to Article I, Section 8 (4).

Consider the nefarious deeds of California legislator, Kevin De Leon, (D-Los Angeles) has openly admitted as follows:

“… I can tell you half of my family would be eligible for deportation under [President Donald Trump’s] executive order, because if they got a false Social Security card, if they got a false identification, if they got a false driver’s license prior to us passing AB60, if they got a false green card, and anyone who has family members, you know, who are undocumented knows that almost entirely everybody has secured some sort of false identification. That’s what you need to survive, to work. They are eligible for massive deportation.”  (see California State Senate Leader: “Half my family here illegally”, by Assemblyman Tim Donnelly, 02/05/2017, Breitbart News)

Is not this legislator active support of a sanctuary state designation for California seditious? This is an individual placed in a position of public trust for lawful residents of the California Republic, a member State of the United States of America. And yet, he brazenly and openly defies, the United States government, declaring the interests of his family and the well-known interests of the Mexican government.

In the author’s opinion, California legislator, Kevin De Leon, conduct goes beyond politically protected First Amendment speech, and clearly crosses the line advocating open defiance of Federal jurisdiction, adoption of criminal conduct, alliance with the interests of a foreign government, seditious conduct toward the Union, and perhaps, an implied separatist mindset for California from ties with Washington.

Consider, that our first American President, George Washington, as Commander-in-Chief, called out Federal forces to subdue the Whisky Rebellion, which was less egregious than certain California legislature’s current conduct and sedition against the government of the United States.

It is long past time, for the loyal and faithful, members of the California legislature and California lawful residents, to call upon the Federal government for assistance, in rooting out, arresting and convicting the traitors in California. If not, the sedition, treasonous conduct and open defiance, like malignant cancer will continue to fester and grow. Many in California desire a borderless State and a surrender of American sovereignty. There also is a growing number wanting succession from Washington, closer ties with Mexico City and the Pacific Rim as an independent State or as a broader entity called Aztlan. Although many belong to La Raza, because of business associations and political contacts, others also adhere to the principle of the breakaway State of Aztlan.  Many La Raza (The Race) members endorse the idea of the theory and mythos of the original homeland of the Aztecs as the American Southwest called “Aztlan” Ponder this citation,:

“Chicano is our identity; it defines who we are as a people. It rejects the notion that we … should assimilate into the Anglo-American melting pot … Aztlan was the legendary homeland of the Azteca’s … it became synonymous with the vast territories of the Southwest, brutally stolen from the Mexican people marginalized and betrayed by hostile custodians of Manifest Destiny.”Statement on the University of Oregon’s MEChA Website (Jan. 3, 2006)” (see Police, The Enforcement Magazine”, Gangs Blog, The Hidden Agenda of Latino Activists, October 05, 2011”)

Such radical views are growing on California Campuses, associations such as La Raza (The Race), among college professors and even in the ranks of the California Civil Service. These radical elements can associate and link up with other subversive groups, such as Black Lives Matter and various Muslim Groups associated with endorsing independent Sharia Law jurisdictions. The ultimate result will be a continued war on cops, drug smuggling, seditious and subversive activity and the endorsement of such lawlessness, by certain members of the California legislature.

The time for loyal residents of California to call upon Federal assistance to stop the spread of this subversive lawlessness is at the present. To delay much further, may only set the stage for greater subversion, lawlessness, treasonous conduct and sedition resulting in violence and mayhem.

The other very serious implication is the question of high treason, by the California Speaker and other members. These legislator’s ties to Mexico should be looked at by the United States Justice Department extremely carefully. The members of the California legislature openly opposing Federal authority over immigration and arrogantly defying Federal jurisdiction over immigration by implication have conspired with the government of Mexico against America and in opposition to the American Constitution. A fair question, regarding fealty and loyalty exists. Are these maverick California legislators loyal to the American Union? Do these rebellious legislators have family, business or governmental ties to Mexico?

Moreover, loyal members of the California legislature should be openly and publicly calling into question the loyalties of those in open defiance and rebellion against United States authority. These loyal members of the California legislature should be fully cooperating with Federal authority and calling upon State subdivisions to remain loyal to Federal policies regarding immigration. There is ample precedence for such conduct in support of Federal Authority. Constitutional authority to faithfully execute the laws of the United States are granted by our constitution to the President. No such grant of authority is entertained for presumptuous State legislatures like California.

Article II, Section 1, reads:

1:” The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. … {see SECTION 1} he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed, and shall Commission all the Officers of the United States.” {see SECTION 3}.


Therefore, the President, through his commissioned officers, such as the United States Attorney General, Border Patrol and if need be, the California National Guard, to investigate, arrest and place on trial, seditionist and treasonous members of the California legislature. These rebellious members placed their allegiance to foreign government, business and family members over the United States government. Such seditious and rebellious conduct should not and cannot stand. President Washington was personally called upon to order a Federal military force into the field to quiet the” Whisky Rebellion”. President Trump may have to follow Washington’s example to put an end to the licentious rebellion in California. This may mean arrests and convictions under the sedition statutes. In the end, this is the duty, the American Constitution places on the President.
{ see 
https://www.britannica.com/event/Whiskey-Rebellion}

 

Add Your Comment

comments